COMPARISON; Classic implants; on-4 implants

AFFORDABILITY; Expensive - During traditional implantation, 8-16 implants are placed in each jaw. This complicates the process and increases the risk of errors and implant rejection. Additionally, it necessitates additional costly procedures;Up to 3 times more affordable - Reduction of the number of implants results in fewer consumables being used. That reduces treatment time and the number of visits to the clinic. This leads to a lower overall treatment cost. INVASIVENESS;High - Requires serious surgical interventions such as sinus lifting and bone tissue transplantation.;Low - No additional surgical interventions are required thanks to the use of modern implants and a special installation technique. CONTRAINDICATIONS;Many - When using the traditional implantation method, there are several contraindications related to neighboring teeth, such as periodontitis, gum inflammation, or the presence of gum pockets, which require prolonged preliminary treatment;Almost none - There are almost no contraindications for On-4 implantation, except for life-threatening conditions such as acute heart failure or oncology NEW TEETH IN; 3-6 month - Additional procedures to compensate for jawbone atrophy, combined with the complexity of laboratory manipulations when working with a large number of implants, significantly increase the duration of treatment. The treatment process can take up to 2 years;1 day - The treatment protocol involves a thorough preliminary diagnosis, which allows for the prosthesis to be manufactured in advance and fixed on the day of implant installation. To determine the appropriate protocol for your case, it is necessary to consult with an expert beforehand. STANDARDIZATION;No templates - The placement of implants and selection of their sizes often occurs during the implantation procedure after making incisions and separating flaps, which increases the procedure time and raises the risk of complications; Templates+ The established technology is suitable for almost any clinical case, which helps to develop clear treatment protocols, and the use of surgical templates allows for the precise placement of implants in the location planned on the computer. TREATMENT TIME;Up to several years- During traditional implantation, due to the uneven levels of bone tissue and the need to correct the gum levels around implants and teeth, it is often necessary to sequentially install implants. As a result, treatment can take several years.;Up to 2 weeks - The installation of implants with a unique surface and special shape, which require low levels of trauma and eliminate the need for bone grafting or sinus lifting, can reduce the total treatment time to just 6-12 days. SUCCESS RATE;XX% - Having too many implants in a limited area can hinder the proper nutrition of bone tissue, leading to resorption and even implant disintegration.;Almost 100% - Modern implants with adequate spacing between them promote good blood supply and nutrition to the bone tissue, ensuring the stability of the implant structure. RELIABILITY;Variable - The prosthesis is often designed with undercuts and implants are placed very close together, resulting in crowns being cemented in place. These factors make hygiene difficult and contribute to the accumulation of dental plaque, which can lead to gum inflammation and peri-implantitis. If any issues arise with the implants or prosthesis, the structure cannot be adjusted;High - The screw connection and the use of a unified connecting framework made of special materials provide reliable support. It's important to note that cement is categorically not used in tooth fixation. It has been scientifically proven that cement residues account for up to 80% of complications in modern implantology.